The House Financial Services Committee’s hearing on cryptocurrency regulation has prompted heated discussion on the future of crypto in America.
The hearing focused on many important aspects of cryptocurrency regulation, such as the SEC’s use of the Howey test to classify crypto assets as securities, the controversial Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB 121), and the growing drive for stablecoin legislation.
Commissioner Hester Peirce, who is renowned for her pro-crypto attitude, used the opportunity to criticize the SEC’s management of the cryptocurrency business, while lawmakers expressed worries about the agency’s approach.
Heated Debate on the Crypto Regulations
The debate revolves around how the SEC treats cryptocurrency. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler stated the agency’s use of the Howey Test, a legal principle used to establish whether something is a security. He made it clear that simply having an asset on the blockchain does not change its essential economic structure.
According to Gensler, many cryptocurrencies fit the limit for being categorized as securities, which means they are subject to SEC regulation. However, Commissioner Hester Peirce, known for her pro-crypto position, disagreed. She claimed that the SEC’s treatment of digital tokens was wrong. She argues that many cryptocurrency tokens do not qualify as securities, and that the SEC’s approach is legally confusing.
Peirce questioned the gaps in how digital assets are regarded in comparison to physical objects such as art, as well as the challenges that crypto companies encounter when attempting to register with the SEC. Her criticisms suggest that the current regulatory framework restricts innovation, which may have a negative effect on the future of crypto in America.
Concern For “Regulations By Enforcement”
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has come under criticism for its “regulation by enforcement” strategy, with lawmakers accusing the agency of crossing its powers and targeting cryptocurrency companies without clear standards.
House Committee Chair Patrick McHenry referred to the SEC as a “rogue agency” under Gensler’s leadership, highlighting larger concerns. Congressman Brad Sherman expressed concern about new rules to clarify the legality of crypto assets, highlighting cryptocurrencies’ particular features, such as hiding fund origins.
Congressman Tom Emmer attacked Gensler’s actions as harmful to the crypto business and questioned whether his attitude is consistent with supporting innovation in America, particularly in Web3 technology. These criticisms indicate a rising unhappiness with the SEC’s handling of the future of crypto in America.
Stablecoins and The SEC’s Roles
The future of crypto in America is heavily dependent on stablecoins, which are digital currencies supported by stable assets such as the US dollar. House Financial Services Committee member Maxine Waters wants to reach a “grand bargain” on stablecoin legislation before the end of 2024.
Stablecoins are a major topic for policymakers, particularly as the United States explores carrying out a Central Bank Digital Currency. The SEC has filed cases against TrustToken and TrueCoin for fraud relating to their stablecoin offers, demonstrating their continued importance in the future of crypto in America.
Want to Know more about SEC cases and crypto’s future? Follow Coin Mozo on X for the latest update!
The Controversial SAB 121 Rule
The SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB 121), which mandates public corporations, particularly banks, to report customer-held crypto assets as liabilities on their balance sheets, has sparked disagreement. Critics claim that this prevents banks from providing cryptocurrency storage solutions, which could potentially prevent innovation.
Republicans, including Patrick McHenry, have asked for the reversal of SAB 121, which President Biden vetoed due to financial stability issues. Commissioner Hester Peirce raised doubts about the rule’s effectiveness, implying that SAB 121 will remain a difficult issue for the future of crypto in America.
The future of crypto in America is at a crossroads due to disagreements among the SEC, lawmakers, and industry executives. The present regulatory system, which relies on existing laws and the Howey Test, restricts innovation and lacks clear standards. The focus on stablecoins and challenging regulations complicates the way forward.
Also Read: Mark Cuban Faith To Become SEC Chairman in Harris Government
